Ravel’s
arrangement is extremely imaginative, showing off his genius for orchestration
and making explicit those things that could only be implied in the original
piano work.
The
brilliance, colour and imagination of the orchestration, however, obscure some
of the valuable characteristics of the original.
The
piano version is very virtuosic. You can see and hear the pianist struggling
with some of the passages. This makes watching and listening to a performance of it a very
physical, visceral experience. The seemingly effortless brilliance of the
orchestral version loses this aspect.
Also,
the suite was written in memory of a recently deceased friend of Mussorgsky’s,
the architect Viktor Hartmann. Arguably, the personal nature of Mussorgsky's
grief is expressed best through the intimate medium of the solo piano rather
than the very public arena of an orchestral performance.
Sometimes
clearing away the rearrangements and modifications that have been made and
added to something over time can reveal original features of forgotten value.
When
you next want to improve a process, or find yourself having to address a problem
that has arisen in a previously trouble free area, peel back the changes that
have occurred to it over time and have a good, detailed look at the original.
Have
various rearrangements and modifications obscured valuable aspects? Could a
refocusing of attention upon the original foundations of a tottering process
help to stabilise, strengthen and even improve it?
No comments:
Post a Comment
I would really like to hear people's views and ideas about music and creativity - just leave a quick message here.